30,000rpm electric EV motor

Post Reply
User avatar
BigBarney
Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: Wed. Feb. 08, 2006 2:48 pm
  • Quote

Post by BigBarney »

More range ... High efficiency... 98.5%...Made in China...

As Scotty says "Lets crank it up" To where we have not been before in EV's or petrol...





BigBarney


User avatar
Richard S.
Mayor
Posts: 15959
Joined: Fri. Oct. 01, 2004 8:35 pm
Stoker Coal Boiler: Van Wert VA1200
Coal Size/Type: Buckwheat/Anthracite
  • Quote

Post by Richard S. »

BigBarney wrote: Mon. Aug. 26, 2024 12:16 pm To where we have not been before in EV's or petrol...
F1 engines were up to 20K before they nerfed it, that was 20 years ago. While that is interesting and all with the claimed 98.5% efficiency there is no where left to go.

User avatar
BigBarney
Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: Wed. Feb. 08, 2006 2:48 pm
  • Quote

Post by BigBarney »

"F1 engines were up to 20K before they nerfed it, that was 20 years ago. While that is interesting and all with the claimed 98.5% efficiency there is no where left to go."

Same as Petrol only much higher...Petrol limited by laws of physics...

Petrol at maybe 25% efficiency... In production engines...

There are some special built engines that get a little higher ...

Will never be produced ...Due to many complications...

BigBarney

User avatar
Richard S.
Mayor
Posts: 15959
Joined: Fri. Oct. 01, 2004 8:35 pm
Stoker Coal Boiler: Van Wert VA1200
Coal Size/Type: Buckwheat/Anthracite
  • Quote

Post by Richard S. »

BigBarney wrote: Mon. Aug. 26, 2024 1:27 pm Petrol limited by laws of physics...
I don't know what you mean by this but you will never get more energy out of an electric motor than you put into it. If they are at 98.5% there is no where left to improve.

User avatar
BigBarney
Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: Wed. Feb. 08, 2006 2:48 pm
  • Quote

Post by BigBarney »

There already there ... No use for any more...

Petrol will never get to 50%...Costs outweigh any benefits...

BigBarney

User avatar
Richard S.
Mayor
Posts: 15959
Joined: Fri. Oct. 01, 2004 8:35 pm
Stoker Coal Boiler: Van Wert VA1200
Coal Size/Type: Buckwheat/Anthracite
  • Quote

Post by Richard S. »

BigBarney wrote: Mon. Aug. 26, 2024 1:36 pm Petrol will never get to 50%...Costs outweigh any benefits...
Come back when you have weighed the production and transmission losses for electric.

User avatar
BigBarney
Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: Wed. Feb. 08, 2006 2:48 pm
  • Quote

Post by BigBarney »

There are no loses in petrol being shipped all over???

They must have free delivery...

Produce at home with solar low loses....

Produce usable petrol at home 0 chance...

The Sun the ultimate fusion reactor....

None can compare.... Also the safest at 93m miles away....

BigBarney


User avatar
Richard S.
Mayor
Posts: 15959
Joined: Fri. Oct. 01, 2004 8:35 pm
Stoker Coal Boiler: Van Wert VA1200
Coal Size/Type: Buckwheat/Anthracite
  • Quote

Post by Richard S. »

BigBarney wrote: Mon. Aug. 26, 2024 2:20 pm There are no loses in petrol being shipped all over???
There is but it isn't anywhere near the loss with electric. It's not even close.

User avatar
Sunny Boy
Member
Posts: 26950
Joined: Mon. Nov. 11, 2013 1:40 pm
Hand Fed Coal Boiler: Anthracite Industrial, domestic hot water heater
Baseburners & Antiques: Glenwood range 208, # 6 base heater, 2 Modern Oak 118.
Coal Size/Type: Nuts !
Other Heating: Oil &electric plenum furnace
  • Quote

Post by Sunny Boy »

BigBarney wrote: Mon. Aug. 26, 2024 2:20 pm There are no loses in petrol being shipped all over???

They must have free delivery...

Produce at home with solar low loses....

Produce usable petrol at home 0 chance...

The Sun the ultimate fusion reactor....

None can compare.... Also the safest at 93m miles away....

BigBarney
Correction - the ultimate part-time reactor.

It shuts down every night, is reduced power on cloudy days and the further you live from the equator. Then even less power in winter due to shorter days and lower sun angle thus reducing solar power even more when you need that power the most.

Paul

User avatar
Richard S.
Mayor
Posts: 15959
Joined: Fri. Oct. 01, 2004 8:35 pm
Stoker Coal Boiler: Van Wert VA1200
Coal Size/Type: Buckwheat/Anthracite
  • Quote

Post by Richard S. »

BigBarney wrote: Mon. Aug. 26, 2024 2:20 pm. Also the safest at 93m miles away....
There is discernible downsides to nuclear fusion. The reaction uses harmless gases producing no highly radioactive elements. It occurs in a vacuum and immediately ceases if the vacuum is lost.

waytomany?s
Member
Posts: 5807
Joined: Fri. Aug. 16, 2019 3:02 pm
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Harmon Mark II
Hand Fed Coal Furnace: Looking
Baseburners & Antiques: Looking
Coal Size/Type: Nut
Other Heating: newmac wood/coal combo furnace
  • Quote

Post by waytomany?s »

Richard S. wrote: Mon. Aug. 26, 2024 2:41 pm There is discernible downsides to nuclear fusion. The reaction uses harmless gases producing no highly radioactive elements. It occurs in a vacuum and immediately ceases if the vacuum is lost.
The reaction stops with a loss of vacuum? I guess that IS a good safety.

waytomany?s
Member
Posts: 5807
Joined: Fri. Aug. 16, 2019 3:02 pm
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Harmon Mark II
Hand Fed Coal Furnace: Looking
Baseburners & Antiques: Looking
Coal Size/Type: Nut
Other Heating: newmac wood/coal combo furnace
  • Quote

Post by waytomany?s »

Ok, I do like the AI for this type of research.
In a fusion reactor, the vacuum is crucial for maintaining the necessary conditions for the fusion reaction. If the vacuum is lost, several issues can arise:

1. **Plasma Contamination:** The loss of vacuum allows air or other gases to enter the reactor, which can contaminate the plasma. Contaminants can cool the plasma and prevent it from reaching the high temperatures needed for fusion.

2. **Reduced Efficiency:** Without a proper vacuum, the reactor's ability to sustain the high temperatures and pressures required for fusion is compromised. This can significantly reduce the efficiency of the fusion process.

3. **Reactor Damage:** In some cases, a sudden loss of vacuum might lead to mechanical or structural damage to the reactor due to the pressure differential.

While the fusion reaction might not immediately stop if the vacuum is lost, the conditions necessary for sustaining it will be disrupted, leading to a halt in fusion activity or reduced performance until the vacuum is restored.

User avatar
mozz
Member
Posts: 1691
Joined: Mon. Sep. 17, 2007 5:27 pm
Stoker Coal Boiler: Axeman Anderson 1982 AA-130 Steam
  • Quote

Post by mozz »

Said this before, efficiency does not equal economical. Anyway, why would you need a electric motor that revs to 30k rpm. Electric motors have the most torque right off the start. Power bragging rights is all. Why do you need excessive power? Kind of defeats the entire green thing to be pushing 500hp and have a nice heavy battery to go along with that.

User avatar
Retro_Origin
Member
Posts: 1513
Joined: Sun. Feb. 21, 2021 7:46 pm
Stoker Coal Boiler: 1957 Axeman Anderson 130
Coal Size/Type: Pea
  • Quote

Post by Retro_Origin »

So what good is 30,000 RPM? Is this so you can use lego sized wheels on a full sized car?

User avatar
Richard S.
Mayor
Posts: 15959
Joined: Fri. Oct. 01, 2004 8:35 pm
Stoker Coal Boiler: Van Wert VA1200
Coal Size/Type: Buckwheat/Anthracite
  • Quote

Post by Richard S. »

It's so you can have ludicrous speed. This never gets old.



Post Reply

Return to “Cars, Trucks, Motorcycles & Aviation”