520 df gives very little hot water with municipal water
-
- Member
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Wed. Oct. 07, 2009 6:51 pm
- Location: Newtown PA Heating 5600 Sq. Ft. built in 1854
I have a df520 and had sufficient hot water up till about 2 weeks ago. I went from Well water to municipal water. At that time the water is not getting hot enough anymore for good showers. Seems the water is colder coming in now then it was from the well. Also had storage tank on well and now comes from main line right into furnace. Any help out there?
- franpipeman
- Member
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Fri. Jan. 11, 2008 4:27 pm
- Location: Wernersville pa
- Stoker Coal Boiler: efm 520 stoker fitzgibbons pressure vessel
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: harman, russo
- Coal Size/Type: rice
- Other Heating: alpine propane condensing boiler radiant floor
what about the basic .... coil need cleaning maybe pressure or change over caused clogged of debris
-
- Member
- Posts: 6515
- Joined: Sun. Feb. 10, 2008 3:48 pm
- Location: Cape Cod, MA
- Stoker Coal Boiler: want AA130
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: DS Machine BS#4, Harman MKII, Hitzer 503,...
- Coal Size/Type: Pea/Nut/Stove
Or crud came in on the new muni pipe install...
Does not take much debris to cut down the flow
Does not take much debris to cut down the flow
- McGiever
- Member
- Posts: 10130
- Joined: Sun. May. 02, 2010 11:26 pm
- Location: Junction of PA-OH-WV
- Stoker Coal Boiler: AXEMAN-ANDERSON 130 "1959"
- Hand Fed Coal Boiler: BUCKET A DAY water heater
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: Warm Morning 414A
- Coal Size/Type: PEA,NUT,STOVE /ANTHRACITE
- Other Heating: Ground Source Heat Pump and some Solar
Plain and simple, all things being equal, colder incoming water will NOT be the same temp out-going.
Make the boiler hotter or slow down the flow to allow the additional BTUs needed the time to bring/make up the addition degrees.
Now obliviously slowing down the flow rate is not a great option but to illustrate the needed results I threw that in.
My water is damn near ice water when outdoors temps dip but having an indirect HWH allows for the circulator speed to be increased to compensate for this and add quickly the BTUs necessary to the holding tank...a tankless coil has NO such option w/o any circulator to push/pull additional BTUs and stack them up in a holding tank.
Find a way to circulate and to store and you will be good to go.
Make the boiler hotter or slow down the flow to allow the additional BTUs needed the time to bring/make up the addition degrees.
Now obliviously slowing down the flow rate is not a great option but to illustrate the needed results I threw that in.
My water is damn near ice water when outdoors temps dip but having an indirect HWH allows for the circulator speed to be increased to compensate for this and add quickly the BTUs necessary to the holding tank...a tankless coil has NO such option w/o any circulator to push/pull additional BTUs and stack them up in a holding tank.
Find a way to circulate and to store and you will be good to go.
-
- Member
- Posts: 3555
- Joined: Tue. Sep. 04, 2007 10:14 pm
- Location: Dalton, MA
- Stoker Coal Boiler: H.B. Smith 350 Mills boiler/EFM 85R stoker
- Coal Size/Type: Buckwheat/anthracite
In my experience a coil will work fine without any kind of tank as long as you maintain an adequate boiler temp. Let's see what's happening now before advising the OP to spend a bunch of money on a tank.
Mike
Mike
- lsayre
- Member
- Posts: 21781
- Joined: Wed. Nov. 23, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Stoker Coal Boiler: AHS S130 Coal Gun
- Coal Size/Type: Lehigh Anthracite Pea
- Other Heating: Resistance Boiler (13.5 KW), ComfortMax 75
I agree! I also improved the comfort factor of my DHW coil greatly by giving it "priority". To do this I added an aquastat to the boiler which shuts off my one and only circulator if the boilers internal temperature falls to 155 degrees (with a 5 degree differential). The effect of this is that even if the T-Stats are calling for heat and their respective zone valves are open the homes multiple heating zones are all (temporarily) starved of heat and thereby the DHW coil is allowed to have all of it, but as soon as the boiler recovers to 160 degrees the circulator comes back on and the homes zones are permitted to be heated again.
Before this modification, if we were taking a shower and multiple zones suddenly called for heat on a really cold day, the shower suddenly went tepid. After this modification, we have not experienced a single tepid shower. I do have a switch that bypasses the aquastat and permits the circulator to run unhindered by this modification, but to date I've never had to use this switch.
I seem to recall that it was both you and Rob who independently suggested this modification to me, perhaps 4 - 5 years ago.
-
- Member
- Posts: 3555
- Joined: Tue. Sep. 04, 2007 10:14 pm
- Location: Dalton, MA
- Stoker Coal Boiler: H.B. Smith 350 Mills boiler/EFM 85R stoker
- Coal Size/Type: Buckwheat/anthracite
ck, that's a lot of $ to throw at a problem without knowing it's needed.
Glad that suggestion was helpful to you, Larry. Didn't you once perform a test that involved running DHW out of your boiler and using the flow rate and change in temp to infer the btu transfer? I don't even remember the overall purpose of the test, but IIRC it showed any doubters that a small, inexpensive coil can produce some serious DHW.
Mike
Glad that suggestion was helpful to you, Larry. Didn't you once perform a test that involved running DHW out of your boiler and using the flow rate and change in temp to infer the btu transfer? I don't even remember the overall purpose of the test, but IIRC it showed any doubters that a small, inexpensive coil can produce some serious DHW.
Mike
- windyhill4.2
- Member
- Posts: 6072
- Joined: Fri. Nov. 22, 2013 2:17 pm
- Location: Jonestown,Pa.17038
- Stoker Coal Boiler: 1960 EFM520 installed in truck box
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: Crane 404 with variable blower
- Coal Size/Type: 404-nut, 520 rice ,anthracite for both
The system was working fine on well water..
The switch to municipal water has changed things...
What happened ?? What changed ??
????
Lets see..... unhooked the well water... hooked to NEW water pipes from NEW municipal install...
Thinking,thinking.........IDEA !!
DIRT !!!!
Do i take some things apart & clean ??
Maybe b4 doing something so simple, i should spend lots of $$$$ on additions to the system to see if that would get away from a simple correction.
Choices,choices.... so hard to decide.
The switch to municipal water has changed things...
What happened ?? What changed ??
????
Lets see..... unhooked the well water... hooked to NEW water pipes from NEW municipal install...
Thinking,thinking.........IDEA !!
DIRT !!!!
Do i take some things apart & clean ??
Maybe b4 doing something so simple, i should spend lots of $$$$ on additions to the system to see if that would get away from a simple correction.
Choices,choices.... so hard to decide.
- lsayre
- Member
- Posts: 21781
- Joined: Wed. Nov. 23, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Stoker Coal Boiler: AHS S130 Coal Gun
- Coal Size/Type: Lehigh Anthracite Pea
- Other Heating: Resistance Boiler (13.5 KW), ComfortMax 75
I rely upon running DHW when I'm starting and establishing a new fire in the S130 Coal Gun. My boiler reaches fan cut-off at 180 degrees, so when first firing up and at about 170 degrees I begin to run hot water adjusted to ~2 gpm into a nearby sink. I have well water, and if I assume the well water coming in at 50 degrees and I measure it going out at 130 degrees (which is where I have mine set at), the differential (rise) is 80 degrees.Pacowy wrote: ↑Tue. Dec. 12, 2017 8:07 amck, that's a lot of $ to throw at a problem without knowing it's needed.
Glad that suggestion was helpful to you, Larry. Didn't you once perform a test that involved running DHW out of your boiler and using the flow rate and change in temp to infer the btu transfer? I don't even remember the overall purpose of the test, but IIRC it showed any doubters that a small, inexpensive coil can produce some serious DHW.
Mike
BTUH = 2 gpm * 60 min/hr x 8.34 lbs/gal x 80 degrees = 80,064
When the boiler has successfully climbed the 80K BTUH wall which I have erected for it, and it eventually hits 180 degrees and shuts off, I then stop running the water into the sink. This practice establishes a nice bed of burning coals in the Coal Gun S130.
This shows that heating only 2 GPM of water via the coil taxes a 130K BTUH input boiler nigh on to the max. There is simply no way possible for an S130 or an AA-130 to sustain more than about a maximum of 2.5 GPM of DHW flow, and that would be questionable in my opinion. An AHS S260 or an AA-260 when running maxed out can however (on paper at least) provide a home with a full 5 GPM of 130 degree DHW via its internal coil alone.
**** But for the purpose of answering your inquiry, it also shows that heating a flow of merely 2 GPM of water to 130 degrees requires 80,000 BTUH of boiler output, or at least 100,000 BTUH of boiler input. That is about twice the heat that my house requires for home heating on the coldest day of the year. DHW heating places far more demand upon a boiler than does home heating. ****
- McGiever
- Member
- Posts: 10130
- Joined: Sun. May. 02, 2010 11:26 pm
- Location: Junction of PA-OH-WV
- Stoker Coal Boiler: AXEMAN-ANDERSON 130 "1959"
- Hand Fed Coal Boiler: BUCKET A DAY water heater
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: Warm Morning 414A
- Coal Size/Type: PEA,NUT,STOVE /ANTHRACITE
- Other Heating: Ground Source Heat Pump and some Solar
Please, everybody, do not ignore the fact that the OP has had a change/difference in incoming water temp.
Not saying there can't be other factors at play here, but please do not ignore the Fact of approx.15*F lower in water.
Thanks
Not saying there can't be other factors at play here, but please do not ignore the Fact of approx.15*F lower in water.
Thanks
Last edited by McGiever on Tue. Dec. 12, 2017 9:59 am, edited 1 time in total.