How Much Oil Are We Saving?

 
User avatar
coalkirk
Member
Posts: 5185
Joined: Wed. May. 17, 2006 8:12 pm
Location: Forest Hill MD
Stoker Coal Boiler: 1981 EFM DF520 retired
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Jotul 507 on standby
Coal Size/Type: Lehigh anthracite/rice coal

Post by coalkirk » Sat. Dec. 06, 2008 9:14 am

In light of some recent posting by the Union of Concerned Scientists on this site and a recent ad campaign to denegrate coal usage as hopelessly dirty, I thought it might be interesting to tally how much oil us coal burners are saving annually. Maybe someone could start a similar thread for propane savings.
Because I heat with coal, I'm not burning 1,200 gallons of oil a year. The next person should state their oil savings and then add it to my 1,200 gallons for a constant running tally.


 
btrowe1
Member
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun. Aug. 24, 2008 11:29 am
Location: South Glens Falls ny
Hot Air Coal Stoker Furnace: Alaska stoker 140 Coal

Post by btrowe1 » Sat. Dec. 06, 2008 9:24 am

I couldn't say, I've burnt coal or wood for so long now I've totaly lost touch with how much I'm saving, I do figure that by next year my new stove (3 years old now) will have paid for it's self. Would have been this year but the bottom has dropped out so I'll add another year.
Last time I can remember back I paid $400 to $450 a month heating my home with gas, That was a December only bill, probably 12 years ago..

 
User avatar
vtec350
Member
Posts: 303
Joined: Thu. May. 08, 2008 4:47 pm
Location: Western Mass.

Post by vtec350 » Sat. Dec. 06, 2008 9:47 am

coalkirk wrote:Because I heat with coal, I'm not burning 1,200 gallons of oil a year
This is my first year burning coal, it's nice to keep the house a lot warmer for less money :D I use to burn aroud 750 gals. of oil a yr.

1200
750
-------
1950

 
choyt002
Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat. Sep. 06, 2008 5:54 pm

Post by choyt002 » Sat. Dec. 06, 2008 9:52 am

Used to burn 1100 gal a year not burning any now

total tally 3,050

Chris H

 
User avatar
jpd989
Member
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue. Nov. 06, 2007 5:43 am
Location: Mt Cobb Pa.
Stoker Coal Boiler: Leisure Line WL110
Hand Fed Coal Stove: D.S. Machine Basement Stove #3
Coal Size/Type: Buckwheat and Chestnut

Post by jpd989 » Sat. Dec. 06, 2008 9:53 am

I used to burn 700 gal a year 1200
750
700
1100
........
3750

 
etribuna
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu. Jun. 12, 2008 8:58 am
Location: Leominster, MA
Contact:

Post by etribuna » Sat. Dec. 06, 2008 10:04 am

About 1100 gallons per year

1100
3750
------
4850

 
User avatar
eelhc
Member
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat. Oct. 25, 2008 9:02 pm

Post by eelhc » Sat. Dec. 06, 2008 10:49 am

I've posted this before but this is an almost impossible calculation.

One has to account for every bit of oil burned and emissions made along the way. For coal this is easier. It's the energy consumed and consumed to mine it out of the ground, deliver it to the breaker, process it and get it to the end user. Many people make a living off of anthracite coal but few are getting wealthy off of it.

Now consider oil... it's much more complicated... To pump a barrel of oil out of the ground 1/2 way across the world, pipe it to a supertanker, haul it 1/2 way across the world to a refiner, refine it, truck it through many layers distribution and get it to the end user... A very difficult calculation. How much of that barrel of oil pumped out of the ground actually YIELDS as BTUs in one's house when taking into account all of the energy (oil) consumed get it to the point where it can be burned for BTUs? Compounding this is the outrageous profits to be made along the way. It costs the Saudi's $1-2 (fully burdened) to pump a barrel of oil out of the ground. Even with oil at $40/barrel the profits are outrageous and it's not done there... Any monies made along the way in the oil business is used to consume goods and services that require energy (oil) to provide. One has to also account for the oil burned in the many private jets and Yachts the Saudi King travels in.

This has become personal... I'm still smarting from $4.50/gal at the pumps. While the sub-prime collapse might have been inevitable IMHO higher oil prices made for a much harsher crash landing. Since I've been turned onto coal (just this year) I am burning it as a matter of strengthening US Foreign policy


 
User avatar
218Bee
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed. May. 07, 2008 10:19 pm
Location: Central, NY

Post by 218Bee » Sat. Dec. 06, 2008 10:52 am

About 850

Total 5700

 
User avatar
steevesj
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Thu. Apr. 24, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: Willsboro, Upstate New York

Post by steevesj » Sat. Dec. 06, 2008 10:58 am

About 900 Gallons.
Total 6600 Gallons saved

 
User avatar
VigIIPeaBurner
Member
Posts: 2579
Joined: Fri. Jan. 11, 2008 10:49 am
Location: Pequest River Valley, Warren Co NJ
Hot Air Coal Stoker Furnace: Keystoker Koker(down)
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Vermont Casting Vigilant II 2310
Other Heating: #2 Oil Furnace

Post by VigIIPeaBurner » Sat. Dec. 06, 2008 11:24 am

About 850 gpy

total up to 7450
eelhc wrote:I've posted this before but this is an almost impossible calculation.

One has to account for every bit of oil burned and emissions made along the way. ....>8
eelhc wrote: ..... 8< Since I've been turned onto coal (just this year) I am burning it as a matter of strengthening US Foreign policy
Agreed! Although the origin of most of the oil the US consumes originates from the North American Continent, keeping our $s here is most important. Just look at our current economic numbers. All of the positives and negatives are very real but difficult to quantify. For the home user, coal is a bit ( :lol: ) more work than just paying the bill and adjusting the thermostat, it supports additional energy related American jobs originating in/from America.

 
User avatar
billw
Member
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon. Apr. 24, 2006 5:40 pm
Location: Dallas, PA

Post by billw » Sat. Dec. 06, 2008 11:31 am

About 800 gallons for me
Total 8250

 
BIG BEAM
Member
Posts: 712
Joined: Fri. Jan. 25, 2008 9:34 am
Location: upstate NY

Post by BIG BEAM » Sat. Dec. 06, 2008 11:52 am

1400 for me

1400
8250
9650

 
jmmazzy
Member
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed. Aug. 27, 2008 7:00 pm

Post by jmmazzy » Sat. Dec. 06, 2008 12:33 pm

1500 for me

9650

11,150

 
User avatar
cArNaGe
Member
Posts: 1102
Joined: Wed. Dec. 12, 2007 11:34 pm
Location: Montrose, PA

Post by cArNaGe » Sat. Dec. 06, 2008 12:45 pm

VigIIPeaBurner wrote: For the home user, coal is a bit ( :lol: ) more work than just paying the bill and adjusting the thermostat, it supports additional energy related American jobs originating in/from America.
I disagree. Ya turning up the thermostat is easier than emptying my ash bucket or loading my coal. But it takes 5 minutes a day. That is it. How much work would you have to do to pay for your oil? Meaning if you work 40 hours a week. How many hours of that week does it take to pay for your oil? You need to think of it that way.

Anyway I've only been burning coal for a month or a little less. But normally I would have already cut about 16-20 full cord of wood. Not including the time I spent installing and building my system it took me about 4.5 hours to get my coal and shovel it in the basement. And 5 minutes a day to refill barrel and empty the ash.

 
User avatar
VigIIPeaBurner
Member
Posts: 2579
Joined: Fri. Jan. 11, 2008 10:49 am
Location: Pequest River Valley, Warren Co NJ
Hot Air Coal Stoker Furnace: Keystoker Koker(down)
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Vermont Casting Vigilant II 2310
Other Heating: #2 Oil Furnace

Post by VigIIPeaBurner » Sat. Dec. 06, 2008 1:04 pm

cArNaGe wrote:
VigIIPeaBurner wrote: For the home user, coal is a bit ( :lol: ) more work than just paying the bill and adjusting the thermostat, it supports additional energy related American jobs originating in/from America.
I disagree. Ya turning up the thermostat is easier than emptying my ash bucket or loading my coal. But it takes 5 minutes a day. That is it. How much work would you have to do to pay for your oil? Meaning if you work 40 hours a week. How many hours of that week does it take to pay for your oil? You need to think of it that way. ...>8...
cArNaGe, we actually agree! The "bit" I refer to is what most non users see as additional work. I've been doing it with coal for 7 years and did it with wood for over 20. It keeps most of the job$ here in the US, not to mention what's local. It's a premium most are able/want to pay for. Most don't think about all that's behind completing the entire task of writing the check (or clicking!) and setting the thermostat. We do! Sort of like getting food from the supermarket - it's just on the shelves. It's parallels what eelhc brought up in his statement.

sorry if this seems to be going off topic, but it's just not all numbers.

Another suggestion... can we add how many tons of coal we are using to show the comparison?
IE: 850 gpy #2 oil vs. 3.95 ton anthracite


Post Reply

Return to “Coal News & General Coal Discussions”