Wood Stove vs. Coal Boiler efficiency
- lsayre
- Member
- Posts: 21781
- Joined: Wed. Nov. 23, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Stoker Coal Boiler: AHS S130 Coal Gun
- Coal Size/Type: Lehigh Anthracite Pea
- Other Heating: Resistance Boiler (13.5 KW), ComfortMax 75
I've been running a wood stove along with my boiler for several days, and from what I can tell based upon coal projected to have been burned (for the case of not burning wood) vs. coal actually burned, and combined with compressed sawdust wood blocks being burned, the wood stove is only around 55% overall efficient, if I assume that my coal boiler is overall 70% efficient. The amount of wood blocks I've burned so far should have saved me 152 pounds of coal, but in actuality have only saved me 119 lbs. of coal. A difference of 32 lbs.
Nearly all of this discrepancy (27 of the 32 lbs.) I can chalk up on paper directly to the wood stove keeping my living room zone at 75 degrees on average vs. 70 degrees for the coal boiler. If the wood stove could somehow maintain the zone it is heating at 70 degrees, the use of wood alongside of coal would in the end be much closer to a wash on a BTU's for BTU's basis.
The wood stove is clearly greater than 55% efficient, but it consistently overheats (75 degrees vs. 70 degrees), and that measures out as a large efficiency strike against it from a cost perspective (albeit that from a comfort perspective 75 degrees does feel much nicer than 70 degrees).
The bottom line is that I would expend roughly 27% more BTU's if burning wood to heat my home. So even if (as is the case for me) the BTU to BTU cost of wood blocks vs. coal is nearly identical, wood loses out to coal. Plus it loses out in the expended effort department big time.
Nearly all of this discrepancy (27 of the 32 lbs.) I can chalk up on paper directly to the wood stove keeping my living room zone at 75 degrees on average vs. 70 degrees for the coal boiler. If the wood stove could somehow maintain the zone it is heating at 70 degrees, the use of wood alongside of coal would in the end be much closer to a wash on a BTU's for BTU's basis.
The wood stove is clearly greater than 55% efficient, but it consistently overheats (75 degrees vs. 70 degrees), and that measures out as a large efficiency strike against it from a cost perspective (albeit that from a comfort perspective 75 degrees does feel much nicer than 70 degrees).
The bottom line is that I would expend roughly 27% more BTU's if burning wood to heat my home. So even if (as is the case for me) the BTU to BTU cost of wood blocks vs. coal is nearly identical, wood loses out to coal. Plus it loses out in the expended effort department big time.
Last edited by lsayre on Fri. Dec. 29, 2017 12:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- hotblast1357
- Member
- Posts: 5661
- Joined: Mon. Mar. 10, 2014 10:06 pm
- Location: Peasleeville NY
- Stoker Coal Boiler: 1984 Eshland S260 coal gun
- Coal Size/Type: Lehigh anthracite pea
- Other Heating: air source heat pump, oil furnace
And how often are you tending the stove? Vs the boiler..
-
- Member
- Posts: 3555
- Joined: Tue. Sep. 04, 2007 10:14 pm
- Location: Dalton, MA
- Stoker Coal Boiler: H.B. Smith 350 Mills boiler/EFM 85R stoker
- Coal Size/Type: Buckwheat/anthracite
I would expect a coal boiler to have efficiency advantages over a wood stove due to use of water as a heat exchange medium and (generally) greater heat exchange surface area.
Mike
Mike
- Rob R.
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 18004
- Joined: Fri. Dec. 28, 2007 4:26 pm
- Location: Chazy, NY
- Stoker Coal Boiler: EFM 520
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: Chubby Jr
Me too. Wood is tricky - so much of the btu content is on the volatiles, that you have to fire it very hard to have good combustion efficiency.
The efficiency of a wood burning appliance that is able to do this and harness the heat from the flue gasses is actually quite good - e.g. The AHS Wood Gun.
The efficiency of a wood burning appliance that is able to do this and harness the heat from the flue gasses is actually quite good - e.g. The AHS Wood Gun.
- lsayre
- Member
- Posts: 21781
- Joined: Wed. Nov. 23, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Stoker Coal Boiler: AHS S130 Coal Gun
- Coal Size/Type: Lehigh Anthracite Pea
- Other Heating: Resistance Boiler (13.5 KW), ComfortMax 75
Wood stove, roughly every 5.5 hours on average. Boiler every 2 - 3 days when it is this cold.hotblast1357 wrote: ↑Fri. Dec. 29, 2017 8:46 amAnd how often are you tending the stove? Vs the boiler..
- lsayre
- Member
- Posts: 21781
- Joined: Wed. Nov. 23, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Stoker Coal Boiler: AHS S130 Coal Gun
- Coal Size/Type: Lehigh Anthracite Pea
- Other Heating: Resistance Boiler (13.5 KW), ComfortMax 75
When I throttled both of the the air inlets and the exhaust flow diverter way down on a relatively fresh load of wood in an attempt to keep the stove temperature from spiking and maintain at a lower temperature, and at achieving longer burn times, I actually experienced a rather quite large puff-back from the wood. That was the end of the experiment in starving the wood of air in order to force it to burn cooler. I called DS Machine and explained it to them, and they told me that for wood I can't cut way back on the over the fire air (they called it the air-wash) like I would do for coal, and in fact they recommend running the over the fire air wash control wide open with wood, and especially with compressed sawdust blocks that have only 5% moisture. I've left it mainly open since that conversation, and no more puff-backs, but at the expense of a much hotter stove. It tends to run at 550 - 560 degrees at its hottest spot when set to avoid puff-backs.
DS Machines alternative to leaving the air wash control wide open was to place a paper clip on my bimetallic thermostat flapper to keep it from being able to fully close. They emphasized that this is was not as good a choice, but would likely also work to prevent wood puff-backs.
On the positive side, the window in the door is staying clean since I stopped throttling down on the air wash control.
DS Machines alternative to leaving the air wash control wide open was to place a paper clip on my bimetallic thermostat flapper to keep it from being able to fully close. They emphasized that this is was not as good a choice, but would likely also work to prevent wood puff-backs.
On the positive side, the window in the door is staying clean since I stopped throttling down on the air wash control.
- lsayre
- Member
- Posts: 21781
- Joined: Wed. Nov. 23, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Stoker Coal Boiler: AHS S130 Coal Gun
- Coal Size/Type: Lehigh Anthracite Pea
- Other Heating: Resistance Boiler (13.5 KW), ComfortMax 75
Not that I can see for compressed sawdust wood blocks, unless you don't mind an occasional boom. I'm certain that I could throttle it down once I was convinced that the volatiles had burned off. I'm also certain that I could open it up further and see 700 degrees, so 550 degrees is OK by comparison.
Don't ever let anyone tell you that you can't get puff-backs from wood.
-
- Member
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Tue. Nov. 13, 2012 9:05 am
- Stoker Coal Boiler: 1948 International boiler, EFM S-20 stoker
- Coal Size/Type: Buck,
Larry, IDK how much wood burning you have done, but I always marveled at the glowing stove pipe we would get on a really cold night here. I never looked to see what the temp of glowing tin is but I know a sh............t load of heat was going up the stack.lsayre wrote: ↑Fri. Dec. 29, 2017 9:34 amNot that I can see for compressed sawdust wood blocks, unless you don't mind an occasional boom. I'm certain that I could throttle it down once I was convinced that the volatiles had burned off. I'm also certain that I could open it up further and see 700 degrees, so 550 degrees is OK by comparison.
Don't ever let anyone tell you that you can't get puff-backs from wood.
Dave
- lsayre
- Member
- Posts: 21781
- Joined: Wed. Nov. 23, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Stoker Coal Boiler: AHS S130 Coal Gun
- Coal Size/Type: Lehigh Anthracite Pea
- Other Heating: Resistance Boiler (13.5 KW), ComfortMax 75
I should clarify that after the volatiles are gone the stove settles down to 400 - 450 degrees for a couple hours, and when it falls from there it is time to feed it again and drive it back up to ~550 - 560 degrees again.
Another plus for the compressed sawdust wood blocks is their unbelievably low ash content. I'm initially guessing at ash removal once a week, and even at that it won't be much ash to dispose of from a volume or weight perspective. Perhaps half a hods worth.
Another plus for the compressed sawdust wood blocks is their unbelievably low ash content. I'm initially guessing at ash removal once a week, and even at that it won't be much ash to dispose of from a volume or weight perspective. Perhaps half a hods worth.
Last edited by lsayre on Fri. Dec. 29, 2017 10:39 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 11417
- Joined: Wed. Nov. 05, 2008 5:11 pm
- Location: Kent CT
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: V ermont Castings 2310, Franco Belge 262
- Baseburners & Antiques: Glenwood Modern Oak 114
- Coal Size/Type: nut and pea
Half the heat in wood is in the gas. Not burning it means smoke, but burning it overwhelms the heat exchange.
The problem was solved hundreds of years ago with massive masonry heat exchange, or in modern stoves with pellet feed a little at a time steadily.
The problem was solved hundreds of years ago with massive masonry heat exchange, or in modern stoves with pellet feed a little at a time steadily.