Has anyone burned stove coal in a Chubby
- keegs
- Member
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Sat. Dec. 24, 2016 7:38 pm
- Location: Bridgewater, ME
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: Chubby (main floor)
- Coal Size/Type: nut
Someone in my area is selling stove coal cheap. Never burned stove coal. Not sure how to burn it Should I mix it with nut? Does it burn hotter? Will it damage the grate ? Anyone have experience to share burning stove coal in a Chubby?
- D-frost
- Member
- Posts: 1182
- Joined: Sun. Dec. 08, 2013 7:10 am
- Location: Southern New Hampshire
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: Harman MK ll
- Hand Fed Coal Furnace: Yukon Eagle I (multi-fuel oil, wood/coal)
- Baseburners & Antiques: Herald 'fireside oak'
- Coal Size/Type: nut/stove-Blaschak/Lehigh
keegs,
I tried mixing 50/50 with nut......it will burn ok.....found it burnt cleaner in the Herald(deeper fire pot and different grate)......only tried it a couple of times.......but, cheap is good, and it has a name you can trust!!!!!
Cheers
I tried mixing 50/50 with nut......it will burn ok.....found it burnt cleaner in the Herald(deeper fire pot and different grate)......only tried it a couple of times.......but, cheap is good, and it has a name you can trust!!!!!
Cheers
- Rob R.
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 17979
- Joined: Fri. Dec. 28, 2007 4:26 pm
- Location: Chazy, NY
- Stoker Coal Boiler: EFM 520
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: Chubby Jr
It won't hurt anything, but you may find it is tough to get the fire as low as you want. Before hauling a bunch of it home I would call Larry Trainer and get his thoughts.
- keegs
- Member
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Sat. Dec. 24, 2016 7:38 pm
- Location: Bridgewater, ME
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: Chubby (main floor)
- Coal Size/Type: nut
Larry mentioned that the stove coal may not burn as well due to the gaps between the larger pieces. He thought mixing it with smaller sizes could make a difference but wasn't sure. He also had some concerns about the quality of the coal, specifically the ash content. I'm not all that fussy as long as I can keep a fire going with it without too much trouble. He recommended trying it out before committing to loading up on it. That makes sense.... but I'm still not sure what I'm going to do though. Hauling it home on my wee trailer will be a chore but the price has my interest.
- HandFire
- Member
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Thu. Feb. 11, 2021 6:06 pm
- Location: Central PA
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: DS 110
- Coal Size/Type: Stove/Nut
I burn stove coal in a much larger, different design stove. I would try a middle layer ( some chunks ) between 2 layers of nut. It flows a lot of air which requires a deep bed. Your probably not going to be able to burn much at a time in ratio to nut with the capacity of a Chubby. Not sure you'd be happy with the results. On the other hand, you could crush it up in smaller pieces. Then you could yourself a Breaker.
- warminmn
- Member
- Posts: 8108
- Joined: Tue. Feb. 08, 2011 5:59 pm
- Location: Land of 11,842 lakes
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: Chubby Junior, Efel Nestor Martin, Riteway 37
- Coal Size/Type: nut and stove anthracite, lignite
- Other Heating: Wood and wear a wool shirt
For a cheap price I'd crush it smaller somehow and burn it in my Jr. Maybe contact member Den034071 (Jack) and ask him how he breaks coal up unless someone else knows how.
- Sunny Boy
- Member
- Posts: 25551
- Joined: Mon. Nov. 11, 2013 1:40 pm
- Location: Central NY
- Hand Fed Coal Boiler: Anthracite Industrial, domestic hot water heater
- Baseburners & Antiques: Glenwood range 208, # 6 base heater, 2 Modern Oak 118.
- Coal Size/Type: Nuts !
- Other Heating: Oil &electric plenum furnace
I ran a pallet of Lehigh stove size through my stoves as a trial few years ago. Because stove coal size averages larger than nut, as mentioned above, so are the air spaces. That not only has an effect on how dampers need to be set, it effects burn times, too.
No matter what you burn it in, stove coal has less fuel density when compared to nut coal in the same space. My test showed a difference of about 10% by weight.
With the stoves dampered to the same heat level output, the stove coal needed to be refueled about 10% sooner. However long your Chubby runs on nut coal between refueling, shorten that time interval about 10% because of that lesser fuel density.
Paul
No matter what you burn it in, stove coal has less fuel density when compared to nut coal in the same space. My test showed a difference of about 10% by weight.
With the stoves dampered to the same heat level output, the stove coal needed to be refueled about 10% sooner. However long your Chubby runs on nut coal between refueling, shorten that time interval about 10% because of that lesser fuel density.
Paul
- tcalo
- Member
- Posts: 2068
- Joined: Tue. Dec. 13, 2011 4:57 pm
- Location: Long Island, New York
- Baseburners & Antiques: Crawford 40
- Coal Size/Type: Nut/stove anthracite
I’ve burned both nut and stove coal in my suspended pot stoves. Like mentioned already:
- Burns hotter
- Quicker recovery times after tending
- You can’t idle as low
- A deeper fire pot is preferred
- Shorter burn times
- Burns hotter
- Quicker recovery times after tending
- You can’t idle as low
- A deeper fire pot is preferred
- Shorter burn times
- keegs
- Member
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Sat. Dec. 24, 2016 7:38 pm
- Location: Bridgewater, ME
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: Chubby (main floor)
- Coal Size/Type: nut
Thank you all for your suggestions. We're heading el norte after the holiday for a week or so. The coal is in 55 gallon drums. If it's still available I'll see if they'll sell me a drum and if it works out I'll go back for more.