Metal Thickness of Kodiak

Post Reply
 
ron54
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat. Sep. 08, 2007 8:41 pm
Location: Milford, PA (Pike County)

Post by ron54 » Sat. Sep. 29, 2007 9:19 am

Does anyone know the metal thickness of the Kodiak?

 
User avatar
Ed.A
Member
Posts: 1635
Joined: Thu. Aug. 30, 2007 7:27 pm
Location: Canterbury Ct.
Hot Air Coal Stoker Stove: Alaska Channing III/ '94 Stoker II
Coal Size/Type: Rice

Post by Ed.A » Sat. Sep. 29, 2007 6:40 pm

My Channing III weighs apprx 400 and the Kodiak about 75lbs more. The Channing has .187 (3/16) thick steel plate construction, the Kodiak appears to be a bit larger so I'd guess it's prolly the same plate thickness when you add in the grates that a Stoker lacks. I'd say it'd come in around 475lbs. as listed on their site.

 
ron54
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat. Sep. 08, 2007 8:41 pm
Location: Milford, PA (Pike County)

Post by ron54 » Sun. Sep. 30, 2007 6:14 am

Ed.A wrote:My Channing III weighs apprx 400 and the Kodiak about 75lbs more. The Channing has .187 (3/16) thick steel plate construction, the Kodiak appears to be a bit larger so I'd guess it's prolly the same plate thickness when you add in the grates that a Stoker lacks. I'd say it'd come in around 475lbs. as listed on their site.
so that means the Kodiak is thinner than the the Harman MKII, yet the MKII is only 449 lbs.

How long do you have your Channing III? How does it hold up?


 
User avatar
Ed.A
Member
Posts: 1635
Joined: Thu. Aug. 30, 2007 7:27 pm
Location: Canterbury Ct.
Hot Air Coal Stoker Stove: Alaska Channing III/ '94 Stoker II
Coal Size/Type: Rice

Post by Ed.A » Sun. Sep. 30, 2007 10:04 am

I don't know......It's my first Coal Stove and it's still a virgin. :wink:

 
User avatar
jpen1
Member
Posts: 614
Joined: Sat. Nov. 04, 2006 4:46 pm
Location: Bloomsburg, PA
Stoker Coal Boiler: LL110
Coal Size/Type: Rice/ Buck

Post by jpen1 » Sun. Sep. 30, 2007 12:16 pm

The kodiak is 3/16 plate steel. The Kodiak weighs more because it is larger in size and has that extra heat shield plate in the rear of the stove.

 
ron54
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat. Sep. 08, 2007 8:41 pm
Location: Milford, PA (Pike County)

Post by ron54 » Sun. Sep. 30, 2007 12:41 pm

jpen1 wrote:The kodiak is 3/16 plate steel. The Kodiak weighs more because it is larger in size and has that extra heat shield plate in the rear of the stove.
does this mean that the Kodiak isn't going to last as long as a Harman?


 
User avatar
LsFarm
Member
Posts: 7383
Joined: Sun. Nov. 20, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: Michigan
Stoker Coal Boiler: Axeman Anderson 260
Hand Fed Coal Boiler: Self-built 'Big Bertha' SS Boiler
Baseburners & Antiques: Keystone 11, Art Garland

Post by LsFarm » Sun. Sep. 30, 2007 2:03 pm

With proper maintenance each spring when you shut down the stove, your Kodiak will outlive you, even if you were five years old.

GL

 
ron54
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat. Sep. 08, 2007 8:41 pm
Location: Milford, PA (Pike County)

Post by ron54 » Sun. Sep. 30, 2007 7:02 pm

LsFarm wrote:With proper maintenance each spring when you shut down the stove, your Kodiak will outlive you, even if you were five years old.

GL
So then why are some stoves thicker than others, ie.. Harman & Baker? What is advantage of thicker steel?

I could have gotten the Harman for around same price as the Kodiak.

 
User avatar
coaledsweat
Site Moderator
Posts: 13767
Joined: Fri. Oct. 27, 2006 2:05 pm
Location: Guilford, Connecticut
Stoker Coal Boiler: Axeman Anderson 260M
Coal Size/Type: Pea

Post by coaledsweat » Sun. Sep. 30, 2007 7:55 pm

ron54 wrote:What is advantage of thicker steel?
The heavier the appliance, the less chance you have of someone running off with it. :)

Really, its about longevity. The heavier units will last considerably longer than the lighter ones.

Post Reply

Return to “Hand Fired Coal Stoves & Furnaces Using Anthracite”