Why Are Clearences More With Harman Than Alaska

Post Reply
 
ron54
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat. Sep. 08, 2007 8:41 pm
Location: Milford, PA (Pike County)

Post by ron54 » Fri. Sep. 21, 2007 10:11 pm

I notice that Haraman's MK series has 24"rear clearence as opposed to Alaska Kodiak with 16" rear. Why the differences? The Kodiak, has a higher rated BTU, so shouldn't the clearences be more than the Harman?

 
User avatar
coal berner
Member
Posts: 3600
Joined: Tue. Jan. 09, 2007 12:44 am
Location: Pottsville PA. Schuylkill County PA. The Hart Of Anthracite Coal Country.
Stoker Coal Boiler: 1986 Electric Furnace Man 520 DF

Post by coal berner » Fri. Sep. 21, 2007 10:25 pm

The kodiak has a removable heat shield on the back the Harman does not if you go to the fair you will see have fun :)


 
ron54
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat. Sep. 08, 2007 8:41 pm
Location: Milford, PA (Pike County)

Post by ron54 » Sat. Sep. 22, 2007 2:00 pm

coal berner wrote:The kodiak has a removable heat shield on the back the Harman does not if you go to the fair you will see have fun :)
Will try and head there this Sunday, thanks

 
User avatar
jpen1
Member
Posts: 614
Joined: Sat. Nov. 04, 2006 4:46 pm
Location: Bloomsburg, PA
Stoker Coal Boiler: LL110
Coal Size/Type: Rice/ Buck

Post by jpen1 » Sat. Sep. 22, 2007 7:16 pm

Ron sounds like the Harman rep will be there again tommorow at stolz's for at least part of the day. Bloom's (alaska) was trying to burn a kodiak but were having a bit of a time with maintaining draft with a very short stack and with the temps in the upper 80's. Stolz didn't even attempt to burn any hand fired stoves only stoker and pellet buring but had hand fired on display.

Post Reply

Return to “Hand Fired Coal Stoves & Furnaces Using Anthracite”