Nestor Martin (Harmony III) Coal Stove

Post Reply
 
stopthespending
New Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed. Apr. 15, 2009 8:06 pm
Location: s.e. pa

Post by stopthespending » Thu. Sep. 24, 2009 8:06 pm

I am looking for a coal/wood combination. I have found that a nestor martin (harmony III) coal stove is made to burn both wood and coal. It is sold in Canada as a duel fuel but in the U.S. as a coal stove. Does anyone know anything about this stove, does it burn coal well? Does Reading sell a quality shaker? Any info. to help make a decision will be appreciated. Thanks, rick U.

 
User avatar
LsFarm
Member
Posts: 7383
Joined: Sun. Nov. 20, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: Michigan
Stoker Coal Boiler: Axeman Anderson 260
Hand Fed Coal Boiler: Self-built 'Big Bertha' SS Boiler
Baseburners & Antiques: Keystone 11, Art Garland

Post by LsFarm » Sun. Sep. 27, 2009 4:53 pm

Please post a photo or two of the stove, or supply a link to a site with a photo or two.. It may be a renamed product we are familiar with. But the name doesn't ring a bell with me.

Greg L

 
stopthespending
New Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed. Apr. 15, 2009 8:06 pm
Location: s.e. pa

Post by stopthespending » Mon. Sep. 28, 2009 12:05 pm

Evolution Trade Group distributes these in the U>S> their web address for these stoves is

The stove sill has the removable coal hopper so burning wood if needed would seem easy enough once I built up some ash.
Any comments would be appreciated. We were also looking at a Vermont Castings vigilant II , both of them I can get at about the same price.
Would either one be better? thanks Rick U.
Last edited by stopthespending on Sat. Apr. 01, 2017 2:09 am, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: <removed dead link>


 
franco b
Site Moderator
Posts: 11416
Joined: Wed. Nov. 05, 2008 5:11 pm
Location: Kent CT
Hand Fed Coal Stove: V ermont Castings 2310, Franco Belge 262
Baseburners & Antiques: Glenwood Modern Oak 114
Coal Size/Type: nut and pea

Post by franco b » Mon. Sep. 28, 2009 3:31 pm

Having a hopper is a clear advantage, but it depends on how well that hopper is made. Too thin it will burn out as the lower part of the hopper in many Surdiac stoves has. The lower lip of the Franco Belge hopper is about 3/4 inch thick cast iron as an example. As far as burning wood goes, bear in mind that that large glass door will probably smoke up in short order.

Looking at the manual there are no illustrations of the grates and shaker mechanism. The design here can make or break a stove. Is the ash pan good size and does it cover the full width and depth of the grates?

Being made in Europe it is probably well made, but that does not mean it is well designed. Many European stoves are beautifully made but work poorly. I would not buy that stove without hearing from some knowledgeable owners first. Don't trust in what the distributor says or even the manufacturer. New stoves are too expensive to take a chance on something that might lead to constant frustration. If you can post some pictures here of the grates and shaker bits there are many experienced members that at least can give you their impression.

The vigilant does not have a hopper and you can put it in search here on this forum and find many reports
as to its foibles and good points. I think most like it.

Richard

 
Pete69
Member
Posts: 277
Joined: Sat. Nov. 01, 2008 1:57 am
Location: WNY

Post by Pete69 » Mon. Sep. 28, 2009 11:23 pm

I like the Nestor Marten. I haven't seen it in person but I think that if someone offered to trade me one for my Vigilant I would take them up on the deal.
The VC and NM look like two very comparable stoves. The Nestor marten has the advantage of a side load door for wood in addition to the top load and front door,
You can also order the Nestor Martin with a back boiler, which is a nice feature.
The VC has the ability to have the flue exit out the top or rear by reversing the flue piece, if that is a benefit to you.
I also like the way the VC routs the exhaust gasses from the top of the sides to the bottom, around to the back, then up and out the flue. A long exhaust path to extract as much heat as possible. You can also open the damper and rout the exhaust straight up the flue.
It is also rated to be able to burn bituminous coal.
The swing out ash pan is also a nice feature on the VC.
The shaker grates on the VC are not very aggressive, and the ash needs to be raked with a poker tool from below the grates in addition to shaking to effectively remove the ash, which is not a big deal, although it is I think the stoves weakest link.
I don't know the exhaust path of the Nestor marten, but it has a good efficiency rating of 80.5%
The only thing I cant find on the Nestor martin is the shaker grate configuration which I would have to know before deciding to buy. Does it shake? Does it cover the entire bottom? If not don't buy!!!
I don't think you could go wrong with either stove. They are two of the nicest looking coal stoves on the market.

 
Pete69
Member
Posts: 277
Joined: Sat. Nov. 01, 2008 1:57 am
Location: WNY

Post by Pete69 » Tue. Sep. 29, 2009 1:33 pm

After looking everywhere on the web to no avail I finally called the main distributed of the Nestor martin stoves for shaker grate specs.
They have a round grate in the center of the bottom connected to a rod that slides it back and forth.
It does not cover the entire bottom and it does not rock back and forth.
On second thought the stove no longer looks desirable to use as a coal burner. I guess I spoke too soon. I can't see how a design like that would clear enough ash for a good burn. Just the 1/2 in. lip on the sides of the baker stove create ash buildup and dead spots in the fire, necessitating vigorous poking and scraping to clear the ash every few days.
I would stay away from it for coal burning, unless convinced otherwise by someone who ran the stove and tout me something I don't know.


 
stopthespending
New Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed. Apr. 15, 2009 8:06 pm
Location: s.e. pa

Post by stopthespending » Sun. Nov. 01, 2009 4:40 pm

I bought the nestor martin a few weeks ago ( A price that I could not pass up). It burns wood well, but it does dirty up the glass after two days of burning. Has not been super cold out yet, but the wood heats the house fairly well (2800 Sq. ft.). I am waiting on a few friends to get together for a coal run so I will comment on that later. There is a rectangular shaker grate, takes up about 80% of the bottom. Rick

 
User avatar
tsb
Member
Posts: 2616
Joined: Wed. Jul. 30, 2008 8:38 pm
Location: Douglassville, Pa
Stoker Coal Boiler: Binford 2000
Hot Air Coal Stoker Stove: LL Pioneer top vent
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Saey Hanover II
Baseburners & Antiques: Grander Golden Oak , Glenwood # 6
Coal Size/Type: All of them

Post by tsb » Sun. Nov. 01, 2009 4:57 pm

These stoves are very similar to the Saey stoves.
Should burn coal very well.

http://www.bierlygroup.com/saey/index.htm

Tom

 
User avatar
captcaper
Member
Posts: 724
Joined: Thu. May. 29, 2008 11:55 am
Location: Northern N.H.

Post by captcaper » Mon. Nov. 02, 2009 7:02 am

It looks similar to a Harman Mark III. Because I heard so many horror stories from people trying to burn coal with a combo stove. Read about them years ago. I'd stay away from it if you want to be safe if you intend to burn mostly coal. My Harman burns wood o.k. when I burn it just to let you know that.
A Harman Mark I II or III is certified for coal only and it does a excellent job at burning it,shaking,etc. Efficient as well

Post Reply

Return to “Hand Fired Coal Stoves & Furnaces Using Anthracite”