Battery Power
- mntbugy
- Member
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Fri. Dec. 23, 2016 2:36 pm
- Location: clearfield,pa
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: D S 1500, Warm Moring 400
- Baseburners & Antiques: Art Garland 145,GW114 ,Clarion 115, Vestal 20 Globe,New Royal22 Globe, Red Cross Oak 56,Acme Ventiduct 38,Radiant Airblast 626,Home Airblast 62,Moores #7,Moores 3way
- Coal Size/Type: stove and nut and some bit
- Other Heating: Propain
- lsayre
- Member
- Posts: 21781
- Joined: Wed. Nov. 23, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Stoker Coal Boiler: AHS S130 Coal Gun
- Coal Size/Type: Lehigh Anthracite Pea
- Other Heating: Resistance Boiler (13.5 KW), ComfortMax 75
I just checked, and right now according to co2levels.org the earths CO2 level is 417.54 ppm (parts per million).
417.54/1,000,000 x 100 = 0.041754% of the air we are breathing.
NASA says that the atmospheric CO2 level on Mars is 95.32%, and the temperature there is on the order of -85 degrees. You would think that with all of that CO2 Mars would be roasting rather than deep freezing. If 95% CO2 is doing nothing to help Mars warm up, how is 0.04% supposed to cause the earth to roast?
Granted, Mars doesn't have much atmosphere, and the atmospheric pressure at its surface is only about 1% of our 14.69 PSI here on earth, but c'mon man... After compensating, 95.32% x 1% = 0.9532% adjusted (vs. our 0.0418%)
And lastly one must factor in that on a sunny day the Earth's surface receives 1,000 Watts of sunlight energy per square meter, while on Mars this figure is 590 Watts per square meter. So 0.9532 x 590/1000 = 0.5624% adjusted (vs. 0.04%)
0.5624/0.041753 = 13.47X
417.54/1,000,000 x 100 = 0.041754% of the air we are breathing.
NASA says that the atmospheric CO2 level on Mars is 95.32%, and the temperature there is on the order of -85 degrees. You would think that with all of that CO2 Mars would be roasting rather than deep freezing. If 95% CO2 is doing nothing to help Mars warm up, how is 0.04% supposed to cause the earth to roast?
Granted, Mars doesn't have much atmosphere, and the atmospheric pressure at its surface is only about 1% of our 14.69 PSI here on earth, but c'mon man... After compensating, 95.32% x 1% = 0.9532% adjusted (vs. our 0.0418%)
And lastly one must factor in that on a sunny day the Earth's surface receives 1,000 Watts of sunlight energy per square meter, while on Mars this figure is 590 Watts per square meter. So 0.9532 x 590/1000 = 0.5624% adjusted (vs. 0.04%)
0.5624/0.041753 = 13.47X
- warminmn
- Member
- Posts: 8189
- Joined: Tue. Feb. 08, 2011 5:59 pm
- Location: Land of 11,842 lakes
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: Chubby Junior, Riteway 37
- Coal Size/Type: nut and stove anthracite, lignite
- Other Heating: Wood and wear a wool shirt
Interesting info and link. Im unsure I trust the figures taken before 1958. So we are 25% higher now than in 1958 and 30-34% higher than hundreds of years ago if their older figures are correct. I'll have to spend some time looking at other stuff on that site. Thanks!lsayre wrote: ↑Sat. Feb. 20, 2021 4:54 amI just checked, and right now according to co2levels.org the earths CO2 level is 417.54 ppm (parts per million).
417.54/1,000,000 x 100 = 0.041754% of the air we are breathing.
NASA says that the atmospheric CO2 level on Mars is 95.32%, and the temperature there is on the order of -85 degrees. You would think that with all of that CO2 Mars would be roasting rather than deep freezing. If 95% CO2 is doing nothing to help Mars warm up, how is 0.04% supposed to cause the earth to roast?
Granted, Mars doesn't have much atmosphere, and the atmospheric pressure at its surface is only about 1% of our 14.69 PSI here on earth, but c'mon man... After compensating, 95.32% x 1% = 0.9532% adjusted (vs. our 0.0418%)
And lastly one must factor in that on a sunny day the Earth's surface receives 1,000 Watts of sunlight energy per square meter, while on Mars this figure is 590 Watts per square meter. So 0.9532 x 590/1000 = 0.5624% adjusted (vs. 0.04%)
0.5624/0.041753 = 13.47X
- lsayre
- Member
- Posts: 21781
- Joined: Wed. Nov. 23, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Stoker Coal Boiler: AHS S130 Coal Gun
- Coal Size/Type: Lehigh Anthracite Pea
- Other Heating: Resistance Boiler (13.5 KW), ComfortMax 75
I think the methane is likely the real culprit, and CO2 is merely a trailing indicator. The charts seem to bear this out, as methane started increasing before CO2 did.
- McGiever
- Member
- Posts: 10130
- Joined: Sun. May. 02, 2010 11:26 pm
- Location: Junction of PA-OH-WV
- Stoker Coal Boiler: AXEMAN-ANDERSON 130 "1959"
- Hand Fed Coal Boiler: BUCKET A DAY water heater
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: Warm Morning 414A
- Coal Size/Type: PEA,NUT,STOVE /ANTHRACITE
- Other Heating: Ground Source Heat Pump and some Solar
High methane...Damn Cows!!!
- warminmn
- Member
- Posts: 8189
- Joined: Tue. Feb. 08, 2011 5:59 pm
- Location: Land of 11,842 lakes
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: Chubby Junior, Riteway 37
- Coal Size/Type: nut and stove anthracite, lignite
- Other Heating: Wood and wear a wool shirt
Synthetic meat is how they will combat methane I bet. At least that will be the excuse for pushing its use. Maybe they are already.