Coronavirus

That would be 1 in about 50 people have had it with the numbers you gave. And 1 in every 2323 people died, again with the number you gave.

If 1 in every million people died it is 7000 people worldwide if the population is 7 billion.

Dr Reiner Fuellmich begins Legal Litigation on the Covid-19 Fraud- The Greatest Crime Against Humanity

https://evolvetoecology.org/2021/02/27/dr-reiner- ... -humanity/


C. And this is the most important part of our fact-finding: the PCR test is being used on the basis of false statements, NOT based on scientific facts with respect to infections. In the meantime, we have learned that these PCR tests, contrary to the assertions of Messrs. Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, do NOT give any indication of an infection with any virus, let alone an infection with SARS-COV-2. Not only are PCR tests expressly not approved for diagnostic purposes, as is correctly noted on leaflets coming with these tests, and as the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, who died in 2019, has repeatedly emphasized. Instead, they’re simply incapable of diagnosing any disease.’

”That is: contrary to the assertions of Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, which they have been making since the proclamation of the pandemic, a positive PCR-test result does not mean that an infection is present. If someone tests positive, it does NOT mean that they’re infected with anything, let alone with the contagious SARS-COV-2 virus. Even the United States CDC, even this institution agrees with this, and I quote directly from page 38 of one of its publications on the coronavirus and the PCR tests, dated July 13, 2020.

First bullet point says:

“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019 nCOV [novel coronavirus] is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”

Second bullet point says:

“The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of 2019 nCOV infection.” Third bullet point says: “This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”

”It is still not clear whether there has ever been a scientifically correct isolation of the Wuhan virus, so that nobody knows exactly what we’re looking for when we test, especially since this virus, just like the flu viruses, mutates quickly. The PCR swabs take one or two sequences of a molecule that are invisible to the human eye and therefore need to be amplified in many cycles to make it visible.

Everything over 35 cycles is – as reported by the New York Times and others – considered completely unreliable and scientifically unjustifiable. However, the Drosten test, as well as the WHO-recommended tests that followed his example, are set to 45 cycles. Can that be because of the desire to produce as many positive results as possible and thereby provide the basis for the false assumption that a large number of infections have been detected?’

The test cannot distinguish inactive and reproductive matter. That means that a positive result may happen because the test detects, for example, a piece of debris, a fragment of a molecule, which may signal nothing else than that the immune system of the person tested won a battle with a common cold in the past.’

Meanwhile, a number of highly respected scientists worldwide assume that there has never been a corona pandemic, but only a PCR-test pandemic. This is the conclusion reached by many German scientists, such as professors Bhakti, Reiss, Mölling, Hockertz, Walach and many others, including the above-mentioned Professor John Ioannidis, and the Nobel laureate, Professor Michael Levitt from Stanford University.’

Grumpy is still the best investigative reporter. Time will tell if this has been a fraud or not.

I’ll take those odds considering the odds of living and dying during one or both Great wars, soldier or civilian. Just a difference in perspective...

3Million dead...or IF 10 million die from this virus still means 6 Billion 990-997 Million get to die of something else. They survive...

Living through a pandemic beats living through a war and what comes with it, any day of the week. Again, a difference in perspective...

The point is...if you think we have it rough now...you are sadly mistaken. Those folks went went through hell and out the other side.

States that didn't lock down this past winter in red, and those that did in blue. Averages in yellow.

https://cms.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/ ... -08-43.jpg

I call it a draw health wise. Red probably has it economic wise.

About wearing masks - from the National Center for Biotechnological Information, a branch of the NIH.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/

Paul

But how can you build a graph of deaths when there is so much corruption involved in getting money for reporting Covid deaths? Or go back and read Grumpy's post.

Kevin

"Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects."

That line says it all.

KLook wrote: ↑

Tue. Apr. 20, 2021 7:18 am

But how can you build a graph of deaths when there is so much corruption involved in getting money for reporting Covid deaths? Or go back and read Grumpy's post.

Kevin

How about divide the number of "Covid-19 deaths" by $20,000.00, the amount the Fed was paying extra for each death certificate reported as a Covid death ? That might get closer to the number of real Covid deaths.

Paul

Strange that India has 300,000 fewer deaths than the US with four times the population, and much lower percentage vaccinated.

perhaps the smog kills the virus.

What you will find out about India, is that on a normal day, only 1 in 5 deaths is reported with a cause of death. If you die at home, not in a hospital, your cause of death is rarely reported.

On that statistic, it would be a reasonable assumption that their death rate would be at least 20% higher.